JEE Advance - Physics (2016 - Paper 2 Offline - No. 14)

Light of wavelength $$\lambda$$ph falls on a cathode plate inside a vacuum tube as shown in the figure. The work function of the cathode surface is $$\phi$$ and the anode is a wire mesh of conducting material kept at a distance d from the cathode. A potential difference V is maintained between the electrodes. If the minimum de-Broglie wavelength of the electrons passing through the anode is $$\lambda$$e, which of the following statement(s) is (are) true?

JEE Advanced 2016 Paper 2 Offline Physics - Dual Nature of Radiation Question 18 English
$$\lambda$$e increases at the same rate as $$\lambda$$ph for $$\lambda$$ph < hc/$$\phi$$
$$\lambda$$e is approximately halved, if d is doubled
$$\lambda$$e decreases with increase in $$\phi$$ and $$\lambda$$ph
For large potential difference (V >> $$\phi$$/e), $$\lambda$$e is approximately halved if V is made four times

Explanation

In photo-electric effect, the maximum kinetic energy of the photo-electron ejected at the cathode, is given by

$${K_{\max ,\,c}} = {{hc} \over {{\lambda _{ph}}}} - \phi $$,

where $$\lambda$$ph is the wavelength of the incident light and $$\phi$$ is the work function of the material. The ejected photoelectrons are accelerated from the cathode to the anode by a potential V. Thus, the maximum kinetic energy of the photo-electron at the anode is

$${K_{\max ,\,a}} = {K_{\max ,\,c}} + eV = {{hc} \over {{\lambda _{ph}}}} - \phi + eV$$.

Now, minimum de-Broglie wavelength of electrons passing through anode,

$${\lambda _e} = {h \over {\sqrt {2m\,{K_{\max ,\,a}}} }} = {h \over {\sqrt {2m\left( {{{hc} \over {{\lambda _{ph}}}} - \phi + eV} \right)} }}$$ ...... (i)

D : For $$V > > \phi e$$

$${\lambda _e} \approx {h \over {\sqrt {2meV} }} \propto {1 \over {\sqrt V }}$$

$$\therefore$$ If V is made four times, $$\lambda$$e becomes $${1 \over {\sqrt 4 }} = {1 \over 2}$$, i.e. halved.

C : When $$\phi$$ and $$\lambda$$ph increases, $$\lambda$$e also increases.

A : From (i)

$${{d{\lambda _e}} \over {dt}} = {{ - h} \over 2}{\left[ {2m\left( {{{hc} \over {{\lambda _{ph}}}} - \phi + eV} \right)} \right]^{ - 3/2}} \times 2m\left( {{{ - hc} \over {\lambda _{ph}^2}}} \right){{d{\lambda _{ph}}} \over {dt}}$$

$$ \Rightarrow {{d{\lambda _e}} \over {dt}} \ne {{d{\lambda _{ph}}} \over {dt}}$$

I : $$\lambda$$e does not depend on d.

Comments (0)

Advertisement