JAMB - English Language (2012 - No. 21)
Answer the following question below and select the option that best explains the information conveyed in the sentence.
I wouldn't have responded to his rude talk, if l were you
I wouldn't have responded to his rude talk, if l were you
the advice was taken by the respondent so he did not respond to the talk
the adviser put himself in the respondent's position, so he did not respond to the talk
the respondent replied to the speaker's talk, althought he ought not have done so
what was advisable was that the respondent gave it back to the speaker
Explanation
Two people are involved in this conversation. The adviser and the respondent. The adviser puts himself in the respondent position, and advised that it was needless in responding to the rude conversation the respondent had with someone .
This means that, the respondent reacted to the rude talk, but the adviser wished he had ignored the talk instead.
Comments (0)
